Search the World of Chemistry
×25th Aug 2019 @ 22 min read
In chemistry, particularly analytical chemistry, the empirical formula is very useful to establish the relative relationship among constituent elements of a compound. Earlier, it was a challenge to determine the elemental composition of a compound. French chemist Antoine Lavoisier was well known for quantitative elemental analysis.
Elemental analysis can be qualitative and quantitative. A qualitative analysis tells us which elements are present in a sample while a quantitative analysis determines the mass composition of elements in a sample. Analysis methods include mass spectroscopy, gravimetry, neutral activation analysis etc.
By knowing the mass composition and the element composition in a given sample, we can generate the empirical formula.
It is the formula formed by atoms of a compound (or a molecule) such that atoms of an element are in the simplest relative ratio.
According to the golden book of the IUPAC, it is “formed by the juxtaposition of the atomic symbols with their appropriate subscripts to give the simplest possible formula expressing the composition of a compound.”
The empirical formula of a compound tells which elements are present in a compound and the relative mass composition of the elements. It does not talk about the number of atoms of an element present in a molecule.
The empirical formula is not the molecular formula. The difference between both is presented in the table below.
Empirical Formula | Molecular Formula |
It presents the simplest positive integer ratio of elements present in a compound. | The molecular formula presents the actual number of atoms of an element in a compound. |
It only tells the relative number of elements in a compound. | It tells the actual number of atoms of an element in a compound. |
Examples are glucose, CH2O; ethene CH2; nitrogen monoxide NO. | Examples are glucose, C6H12O6; ethene, C2H4; dinitrogen dioxide, N2O2. |
Note:
The table list some compounds with their empirical and molecular formula.
Compounds | Empirical Formula | Molecular Formula |
Calcium Sulphate | CaSO4 | CaSO4 |
Sulphuric Acid | H2SO4 | H2SO4 |
Sodium Chloride | NaCl | NaCl |
Dinitrogen Dioxide1 | NO | N2O2 |
Nitrogen Monoxide1 | NO | NO |
Methane | CH4 | CH4 |
Ethanol2 | C2H6O | C2H6O |
Dimethyl Ether2 | C2H6O | C2H6O |
Acetylene3 | CH | C2H2 |
Benzene3 | CH | C6H6 |
Glucose4 | CH2O | C6H12O6 |
Glyceraldehyde4 | CH2O | C3H6O3 |
Propanal5 | C3H6O | C3H6O |
Acetone5 | C3H6O | C3H6O |
Formaldehyde6 | CH2O | CH2O |
Acetic Acid6 | CH2O | C2H4O2 |
Nitrobenzene | C6H5NO2 | C6H5NO2 |
The compounds superscripted by the same number (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) have the same empirical and/or molecular formula. |
The word “empirical” suggests experimental observations. We may identify unknown compounds using elemental analysis (experiments) and predict the respective empirical formula (or molecular formula if the molar mass of a compound is known). Through elemental analysis, we can determine which elements are in a sample and their relative mass composition. By knowing these, we can follow the steps below to generate the empirical or molecular formula.
Step 1: Convert mass percentages to the gram by considering 100 g of a sample. For example, 74.83 % of carbon becomes 74.83 g of carbon and 25.17 % of hydrogen becomes 25.17 g of hydrogen.
Step 2: Convert the gram of elements into the mole by dividing the gram to the molar mass of an element. For example, 74.83 g of carbon is 74.83 ÷ 12.011 g mol−1 = 6.230 mol of carbon and 25.17 g of hydrogen is 25.17 ÷ 1.008 g mol−1 = 24.97 mol of hydrogen.
Step 3: Take ratios of each value of moles to the smallest value of moles and then approximate the ratios to the nearest whole number. For example, 6.230 mol is the smallest. So, the ratio is 24.97 ÷ 6.230 = 4.008. The ratio is approximated to the closest whole number, 4.035 ≈ 4.
Note: If a ratio can not be approximated, try to multiply it with the smallest number such that the product is a whole number. And multiply the remaining ratios with the same smallest number. For example, if a ratio is 1.333, multiply it with 3, which is the smallest number that will result in a whole number. Thus, 1.333 × 3 ≈ 4.
Step 4: Now, the empirical formula is made by placing each of the whole numbers as the subscript to respective elements.
Once the empirical formula is estimated, we can also find the molecular formula if the molar mass is known.
Step 5: Determine the ratio of the molar mass to the empirical formula mass. Approximate the ratio to the closest whole number and multiply the whole number to the empirical formula to get the molecular formula.
Let take a proper example to make the above steps clearer.
Given Data: Elemental analysis shows a compound has carbon and hydrogen. And the mass percentages are 82.66 % of carbon and 17.34 % of hydrogen. Also, the molar mass of the compound is 58.12 g mol−1.
Now, follow the above steps.
Step 1: Consider a 100 g of the compound. So, it contains 82.66 g of carbon and 17.34 g of hydrogen.
Step 2: The molar mass of carbon and hydrogen is 12.011 g mol−1 and 1.008 g mol−1. The moles of carbon and hydrogen are calculated as follows:
Step 3: nC = 6.882 0 mol is the smallest number. So, The ratios is .
Now, 2.5 is not a whole number. So, to make it a whole number we multiply it by 2.
Thus, the mole of carbon to the mole of hydrogen ratio is 5 : 2.
Step 4: We can write the empirical formula by placing the numbers as the subscript to the element’s symbols.
Therefore, the empirical formula is C2H5.
Step 5: The molar mass of the compound is known to us, M = 58.12 g mol−1. The empirical mass of the compound is obtained by adding the molar mass of individual elements.
Let the ratio of the molar mass to empirical mass be r.
Thus, multiplying 2 to the empirical formula, 2 × C2H5 = C4H10.
Finally, the molecular formula is C4H10.
The unknown compound is butane. But we cannot determine which butane is it; it can be n-butane or isobutane.
Note: From the above example it is clear the empirical or molecular formula is not helpful to identify isomers of a compound.
Let consider another example.
Given Data: The mass composition of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen is 66.63 %, 11.18 %, and 22.19 % respectively. The molar mass of the compound is 144.214 g mol−1.
Step 1: Consider a 100 g of the compound. So, it contains 66.63 g of carbon, 11.18 g of hydrogen, and 22.19 g of oxygen.
Step 2: The molar mass of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen is 12.011 g mol−1, 1.008 g mol−1, and 15.999 g mol−1. The moles of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen are calculated as follows:
Step 3: nO = 1.387 0 mol is the smallest number. So, The ratios are and
.
Thus, the mole ratio of carbon to oxygen and hydrogen to oxygen is 4 : 1 and 8 : 1.
Step 4: We can write the empirical formula by placing the numbers as the subscript to the element’s symbols.
Therefore, the empirical formula is C4H8O.
Step 5: The molar mass of the compound is known to us, M = 144.214 g mol−1. The empirical mass of the compound is obtained by adding the molar mass of individual elements.
Let the ratio of the molar mass to empirical mass be r.
Thus, multiplying 2 to the empirical formula, 2 × C4H8O = C8H16O2.
Finally, the molecular formula is C8H16O2.
There are many compounds with the molecular formula C8H16O2. So, the identity of the compound is still unknown, but some of them are mentioned below.
Given Data: An experiment was conducted and it is known that the sample contains carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen. The mass composition of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen is 42.87 %, 2.40 %, 16.66 %, and 38.07 % respectively. The molar mass of the compound is 168.096 g mol−1.
Step 1: Consider a 100 g of the compound. So, it contains 42.87 g of carbon, 2.40 g of hydrogen, 16.66 g of nitrogen, and 38.07 g of oxygen.
Step 2: The molar mass of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen is 12.011 g mol−1, 1.008 g mol−1, 14.007 g mol−1, and 15.999 g mol−1. The moles of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen are calculated as follows:
Step 3: nN = 1.189 4 mol is the smallest number. So, The ratios are ,
, and
.
Thus, the mole ratio of carbon to nitrogen, hydrogen to nitrogen, and oxygen to nitrogen is 3 : 1, 2 : 1, and 2 : 1.
Step 4: We can write the empirical formula by placing the numbers as the subscript to the element’s symbols.
Therefore, the empirical formula is C3H2NO2.
Step 5: The molar mass of the compound is known to us, M = 168.096 g mol−1. The empirical mass of the compound is obtained by adding the molar mass of individual elements.
Let the ratio of the molar mass to empirical mass be r.
Thus, multiplying 2 to the empirical formula, 2 × C3H2NO2 = C6H4N2O4.
Finally, the molecular formula is C6H4N2O4.
There are many compounds with the molecular formula C6H4N2O4. So, the identity of the compound is still unknown, but some of them having the same molecular formula are mentioned below.
Given Data: A compound has the mass composition of 27.9 % of iron, 24.1 % of sulphur, and 48.0 % of oxygen. The molar mass of the compound is unknown.
Step 1: Consider a 100 g of the compound. So, it contains 27.9 g of iron, 24.1 g of sulphur, and 48.0 g of oxygen.
Step 2: The molar mass of iron, sulphur, and oxygen is 55.845 g mol−1, 32.065 g mol−1, and 15.999 g mol−1. The moles of iron, sulphur, and oxygen are calculated as follows:
Step 3: nFe = 0.499 6 mol is the smallest number. So, The ratios are and
.
1.5 is not a whole number. So, we need to multiply by 2 to get a whole number.
We need to multiply the same number to .
Thus, the mole ratio of sulphur to iron and oxygen to iron is 3 : 2 and 12 : 2.
Step 4: We can write the empirical formula by placing the numbers as the subscript to the element’s symbols.
Therefore, the empirical formula is Fe2S3O12.
Given Data: An ionic compound has the mass composition of 60.30 % of magnesium and 39.70 % of oxygen.
Step 1: Consider 100 g of the compound. So, it contains 60.30 g of magnesium and 39.70 g of oxygen.
Step 2: The molar mass of magnesium and oxygen is 24.305 g mol−1 and 15.999 g mol−1. The moles of magnesium and oxygen are calculated as follows:
Step 3: nMg = 2.481 0 mol is the smallest number. So, The ratios are
Thus, the mole ratio of oxygen to magnesium is 1 : 1.
Step 4: We can write the empirical formula by placing the numbers as the subscript to the element’s symbols.
Therefore, the empirical formula is MgO.
If the molar mass of the compound is 40.304 g mol−1, the compound is magnesium oxide.
Given Data: The mass composition of a sample is 52.67 % of carbon, 9.33 % of hydrogen, 6.82 % of nitrogen, and 31.18 % of oxygen.
Given Data: This compound is a cobalt complex. It has the mass composition of 6.78 % of hydrogen, 31.42 % of nitrogen, 39.76 % of chlorine, and 22.04 % of cobalt. The molar mass of the compound is unknown.
Given Data: The molar mass of a compound is 119.38 g mol−1. It has the mass composition of 10.06 % of carbon, 0.85 % of hydrogen, and 89.09 % of chlorine.
Given Data: The compound is an acid having the molar mass of 98.08 g mol−1. It has the mass composition of 2.06 % of hydrogen, 32.69 % of sulphur, and 65.25 % of oxygen.
Copy Article Cite
Join the Newsletter
Subscribe to get latest content in your inbox.
We won’t send you spam.